Great blog. I love all the data. I am not convinced assessment integrity is going to remain high on the list. It’s a carryover of an old system. I do think anything that supports: 1) closing the attainment gap and onboarding students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, 2) increasing university funding options (what does MOOC 5.0 look like?) and 3) making professors master of the content, enabling them to modernise currlculum and disintermediate legacy publishers will succeed.
Shout out to Perlego who has done a fantastic job with the textbook market.
Great blog. I love all the data. I am not convinced assessment integrity is going to remain high on the list. It’s a carryover of an old system. I do think anything that supports: 1) closing the attainment gap and onboarding students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, 2) increasing university funding options (what does MOOC 5.0 look like?) and 3) making professors master of the content, enabling them to modernise currlculum and disintermediate legacy publishers will succeed.
Shout out to Perlego who has done a fantastic job with the textbook market.
Assessment integrity will remain relevant as long as there are assessments. But the models or methods? They may need to be re-imagined.